OncoHub.ai
OncoHub.ai
Oncology Scientific Bulletin
ESMO 2026 · Day 4 Summary
ESMO Congress · Day 4 Digest

ESMO 2026 — End-of-Day Summary

An abstract digest clustered by tumour group and ranked by clinical priority. Numerical results (HR, PFS, OS, ORR) are preserved verbatim; reliability caveats are embedded within each study's card.

Date: 26 October 2026 Scope: 68 official abstracts (Proffered Paper / Rapid Oral) + 15 ESMO news items Layout: Disease group → clinical priority

How this digest is organized

  1. Primary axis — disease group: Each item was clustered by tumour group / official ESMO track (Breast Cancer, Thoracic / Lung Cancer, Gastrointestinal Cancers, Genitourinary Cancers, Gynaecological Cancers, Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours, NETs & Endocrine Tumours, Developmental Therapeutics & Early Phase, Prevention, Screening & Early Detection, Translational Research & Biomarkers, Supportive, Palliative & Survivorship, Public Policy, Access & Health Services).
  2. Secondary axis — clinical priority: Cards and sections were ranked into three tiers (key below).
  3. Reliability inside the card: Hedging present in the source (interim, immature, small n, retrospective, non-ESMO data) is placed as a caveat strip inside the relevant card.
  4. Embargoed titles separated: Late-breaking Plenary / Presidential Symposium abstracts whose results are embargoed until presentation are collected in a dedicated section at the end.
High — practice-changing / -capable positive or negative pivotal Phase 3, plenary dataMedium — long-term / subgroup update, validation, biomarker, promising Phase 2Watch — early phase, preliminary, small n, real-world / health services

Highlights of the Day

practice-changing findings, ranked
EGFRm MET-OE/AMP NSCLC post-osi
SAFFRON (LBA6)
EGFRm MET-OE/AMP NSCLC post-osi — mPFS 7.6 vs 5.4 mo; HR 0.55 (0.42–0.72); mOS 17.8 vs 12.9 mo; HR 0.68 (0.50–0.91)
🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer
SANOVO (LBA69)
Dual oral regimen as potential new 1L option in biomarker-defined EGFRm/MET-OE NSCLC.
1L EGFRm MET-OE NSCLC — ITT mPFS 24.9 vs 13.8 mo; HR 0.56 (0.43–0.74); mOS 44.5 vs 34.9 mo; HR 0.48
🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer
PANKU-Lung01 (LBA71)
First-in-class bispecific ADC proposed as new SoC in this setting in China.
EGFRm NSCLC post 3G EGFR TKI — mPFS 11.14 vs 5.65 mo; HR 0.40 (0.31–0.51); ORR 60.2% vs 34.5%
🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer
HERON-Lung01 (LBA72)
Supports HER3 ADC as new SoC after EGFR-TKI in EGFRm NSCLC.
EGFRm NSCLC post EGFR-TKI — mPFS 8.3 vs 5.4 mo; HR 0.47 (0.36–0.60); ORR 60.0% vs 34.3%
🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer
Neotorch (LBA64)
Final analysis confirms EFS, MPR, OS benefit for perioperative toripalimab.
resectable stage II/III NSCLC — EFS HR 0.52 (0.391–0.677); OS HR 0.66 (0.486–0.894); MPR 47.2% vs 9.2%; pCR 25.6% vs 1.2%
🌸 Gynaecological Cancers
TroFuse-005 (LBA11)
New treatment option for previously treated endometrial cancer.
pretreated a/r endometrial — mPFS 7.2 vs 3.9 mo; HR 0.59; mOS 19.0 vs 12.1 mo; HR 0.68; ORR 35.1% vs 17.3%
dMMR a/r EC 1L
KEYNOTE-C93 (LBA12)
dMMR a/r EC 1L — mPFS 38.2 vs 8.4 mo; HR 0.57 (0.42–0.79); 36-mo OS 70.7% vs 62.0%; HR 0.77
🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours
ARTEMIS-011 (LBA9)
Potential new standard for R/R osteosarcoma.
R/R osteosarcoma — BICR mPFS 5.5 vs 1.4 mo; HR 0.33; p<0.0001; OS HR 0.51

🎀 Breast Cancer

10 studies

🎀 Breast Cancer

OptiTROP-Breast01 — sacituzumab tirumotecan vs chemo (pretreated mTNBC) final OS

4639RO
● High priorityPhase 3TROP2 ADCTNBC

Indication: Pretreated locally recurrent/metastatic TNBC after ≥2 prior lines

Key finding: mOS 14.7 vs 9.9 mo; HR 0.60 (0.45–0.80); 24-mo OS 33.8% vs 21.4%; 30-mo OS 26.8% vs 13.2%. Adjusted HR for subsequent ADC 0.55 (0.39–0.73).

Clinical relevance: Sustained OS benefit confirms sac-TMT as a key option in pretreated mTNBC.

Source: ESMO 2026 4639RO · Man Li

🎀 Breast Cancer

BRIDGET — tucatinib added to HP or T-DM1 after isolated intracranial progression (HER2+ MBC)

1767RO
● High priorityPhase 2HER2+CNS

Indication: HER2+ MBC with isolated intracranial progression post SRS, stable/no ECD

Key finding: Median iPFS not reached vs historical 5.0 mo (p<0.0001); 6/12/18-mo iPFS 91%/64%/59%; extracranial progression 4.3%; grade ≥3 AEs 15%.

Clinical relevance: Supports adding tucatinib to HP after local therapy for CNS-only progression.

Single-arm vs historical control

Source: ESMO 2026 1767RO · Sarah Sammons

🎀 Breast Cancer

DESTINY-Breast09 CNS analysis — T-DXd + P vs THP (1L HER2+ a/mBC with BL BMs)

LBA49
● High priorityPhase 3HER2+Brain mets

Indication: 1L HER2+ a/mBC with baseline brain metastases

Key finding: In 61 pts with BL BMs: mPFS 36.5 vs 11.1 mo; CNS-PFS NE vs 9.7 mo; HR 0.26 (0.11–0.57); CNS-cORR 51.6% vs 26.7%; CNS-DOR NE vs 18.5 mo.

Clinical relevance: Robust CNS activity supports 1L T-DXd + P in HER2+ MBC with BMs.

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA49 · Cristina Saura Manich

🎀 Breast Cancer

SWITCH — target switching with conserved-payload novel ADCs after prior ADC (MBC)

4RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2ADC resistance

Indication: HER2-negative MBC progressing after ≥1 prior ADC (94.4% prior TOP1i ADC)

Key finding: Confirmed ORR: Cohort A 0%, B 8.3%, C 0%, D 5%. Responses only after switch from MMAE ADC (RC48) to TOP1i ADC.

Clinical relevance: Payload cross-resistance appears to drive ADC failure; diversified payloads needed.

Small cohorts; heavily pretreated

Source: ESMO 2026 4RO · Lei Fan

🎀 Breast Cancer

SYS6043 — B7-H3 ADC (advanced breast cancer phase 1/2)

5RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1/2B7-H3 ADC

Indication: Advanced HR+/HER2- BC, TNBC, HER2+ BC post standard therapy

Key finding: ORR 45.7% (HR+/HER2-, n=70), 70.6% (TNBC, n=34), 71.4% (HER2+, n=21); grade ≥3 TRAEs 24.1%; most common neutropenia 9.5%.

Clinical relevance: Encouraging activity across BC subtypes supports further development.

Source: ESMO 2026 5RO · Hongxia Wang

🎀 Breast Cancer

Bulumtatug fuvedotin (9MW2821) — Nectin-4 ADC in la/mTNBC post TopI ADC

4640RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2Nectin-4 ADC

Indication: la/mTNBC previously treated with TopI-based ADCs

Key finding: ORR 30.0% (18.85–43.21); DCR 80.0%; mPFS 3.7 mo; mDOR 8.7 mo. Grade ≥3 TRAEs ≥5%: neutropenia, leukopenia, AST elevation.

Clinical relevance: Rational payload-switch strategy post TopI ADC in TNBC.

Source: ESMO 2026 4640RO · Yanchun Meng

🎀 Breast Cancer

INSPIRE-LM — RT then IT trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HER2+ breast LM)

1768RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2LMHER2+

Indication: HER2+ breast leptomeningeal metastasis

Key finding: 30 pts enrolled; IT trastuzumab 80 mg + pertuzumab 80 mg following RT; detailed OS/LM-PFS outcomes to be reported.

Clinical relevance: Addresses a setting with very limited options.

Abstract text truncated

Source: ESMO 2026 1768RO · Kamran Ahmed

🎀 Breast Cancer

DETECT V CTC score — ER/HER2 CTC profiling (triple-positive aBC)

1769RO
● Medium priorityPhase 3 translationalCTC

Indication: Triple-positive aBC in DETECT V

Key finding: High-risk CTC score associated with shorter PFS (15.4 vs 20.6 mo; p=0.021) and OS (p<0.001); CTC enumeration alone not significant (p=0.082).

Clinical relevance: DETECT CTC score refines prognostic/predictive stratification.

Exploratory

Source: ESMO 2026 1769RO · Kerstin Pfister

🎀 Breast Cancer

HER2-CR — ultra-sensitive MRD in HER2+ MBC long-term complete responders

1770RO
● Medium priorityMRDctDNAHER2+

Indication: HER2+ MBC with CR/PR ≥2 y on anti-HER2 therapy

Key finding: 131/142 samples (92.3%) ctDNA-negative; persistent-negative 30/37 (81%); ctDNA-clearance 2 (5%); late conversion 1 (3%); persistent-positive 4 (11%).

Clinical relevance: Supports concept of molecular CR and future de-escalation trials.

Short follow-up (12 mo)

Source: ESMO 2026 1770RO · Kazuki Nozawa

🎀 Breast Cancer

Paired-biopsy multi-omics of ADC resistance in MBC (T-DXd, SG)

4449RO
● Medium priorityTranslationalADC resistance

Indication: MBC progressing on T-DXd and/or SG

Key finding: HER2 decrease in 8/14 (57%) post T-DXd; no consistent TROP2 change post SG; >50% showed upregulation of ABCB1/ABCC1 and DDR/trafficking changes; functional validation of ABC-transporter resistance.

Clinical relevance: Highlights payload-efflux and trafficking as resistance drivers beyond target modulation.

Source: ESMO 2026 4449RO · Paolo Tarantino

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

18 studies

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

SANOVO — savolitinib + osimertinib vs placebo + osimertinib (1L EGFRm MET-OE NSCLC)

LBA69
● High priorityPhase 3EGFRmMET-OE

Indication: 1L EGFR mut (ex19del/L858R) MET-OE advanced NSCLC (China)

Key finding: MET IHC 3+: mPFS 24.8 vs 11.1 mo; HR 0.45 (0.31–0.66); p<0.0001. ITT: mPFS 24.9 vs 13.8 mo; HR 0.56 (0.43–0.74). ITT mOS 44.5 vs 34.9 mo; HR 0.48 (0.33–0.68).

Clinical relevance: Dual oral regimen as potential new 1L option in biomarker-defined EGFRm/MET-OE NSCLC.

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA69 · Yi-Long Wu

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

Dalmelitinib + aumolertinib vs platinum chemo (EGFRm MET-amp NSCLC post EGFR TKI)

2615O
● High priorityPhase 3EGFRmMET-amp

Indication: Advanced EGFRm NSCLC with MET-amp (GCN ≥5 or MET/CEP7 ≥2) post EGFR TKI

Key finding: mPFS-IRC 6.2 vs 4.4 mo; HR 0.601 (0.448–0.805); p<0.001; ORR 59.6% vs 38.6%; mDoR 9.7 vs 4.4 mo; mOS NR vs 19.6 mo; HR 0.840.

Clinical relevance: New TKI-combo option after 3G EGFR TKI failure with MET-amp.

OS immature; crossover 46.8%

Source: ESMO 2026 2615O · Ziming Li

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

PANKU-Lung01 — izalontamab brengitecan vs PBC (EGFRm NSCLC post 3G EGFR TKI)

LBA71
● High priorityPhase 3EGFR/HER3 ADC

Indication: Advanced EGFRm non-squamous NSCLC post 3G EGFR TKI

Key finding: mPFS 11.14 (9.17–12.68) vs 5.65 mo (5.45–5.95); HR 0.40 (0.31–0.51); p<0.0001. OS HR 0.66 (0.47–0.91). cORR 60.2% vs 34.5%; mDOR 10.45 vs 5.68 mo.

Clinical relevance: First-in-class bispecific ADC proposed as new SoC in this setting in China.

OS immature

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA71 · Li Zhang

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

HERON-Lung01 — ruzaltatug rezetecan vs PBC (EGFRm NSCLC post EGFR-TKI)

LBA72
● High priorityPhase 3HER3 ADC

Indication: Advanced EGFRm non-squamous NSCLC post EGFR-TKI

Key finding: mPFS 8.3 vs 5.4 mo; HR 0.47 (0.36–0.60); p<0.0001. OS HR 0.70 (0.43–1.14). ORR 60.0% vs 34.3%; mDOR 8.5 vs 4.4 mo. ILD 2.4% (grade 1–2 n=5; grade 3 n=1).

Clinical relevance: Supports HER3 ADC as new SoC after EGFR-TKI in EGFRm NSCLC.

OS immature; 19.4% crossover

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA72 · Chongrui Xu

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

DeLLphi-304 — tarlatamab vs chemo (previously treated SCLC) extended OS

3808O
● High priorityPhase 3SCLCDLL3

Indication: SCLC after 1L platinum-based CTx

Key finding: mOS 13.6 vs 8.4 mo; HR 0.62 (0.51–0.76); 18-mo OS 42% vs 24%; mPFS 4.2 vs 3.2 mo; HR 0.69. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 28% vs 63%.

Clinical relevance: Reinforces tarlatamab as SoC in 2L+ SCLC incl. brain mets and platinum-resistant disease.

Source: ESMO 2026 3808O · Charles M. Rudin

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

Neotorch — perioperative toripalimab + chemo vs placebo + chemo (resectable stage II/III NSCLC)

LBA64
● High priorityPhase 3PerioperativeNSCLC

Indication: Resectable stage II or III NSCLC (EGFR/ALK WT for non-squamous)

Key finding: INV-EFS: NR vs 20.2 mo; HR 0.52 (0.391–0.677); p<0.0001. OS HR 0.66 (0.486–0.894); p=0.0072. BIPR-MPR 47.2% vs 9.2%; pCR 25.6% vs 1.2%.

Clinical relevance: Final analysis confirms EFS, MPR, OS benefit for perioperative toripalimab.

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA64 · Shun Lu

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

ASTRIDE — serplulimab vs atezolizumab + chemo (US ES-SCLC)

3809O
● High priorityPhase 3ES-SCLCBridging

Indication: US pts with ES-SCLC, 1L

Key finding: mOS 12.4 vs 10.2 mo; 24-mo OS 32.2% vs 17.6%; mPFS 5.4 vs 4.9 mo; HR 0.95. No liver mets subgroup mOS 18.9 vs 13.2 mo; HR 0.60.

Clinical relevance: Supports serplulimab + chemo as 1L option in US ES-SCLC population.

Descriptive statistics only (bridging design)

Source: ESMO 2026 3809O · David R. Gandara

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

KEYNOTE-671 biomarker analysis — perioperative pembro + chemo (early NSCLC)

2519O
● Medium priorityPhase 3 translationalBiomarker

Indication: Resectable stage II–IIIB(N2) NSCLC

Key finding: TcellinfGEP associated with EFS (p=0.021), MPR (p=0.019) with pembro; TMB associated with EFS (p=0.000164), OS (p=0.005). EFS/OS HRs favour pembro across TcellinfGEP, TMB, KRAS subgroups.

Clinical relevance: Supports perioperative pembro regardless of biomarker status.

Post hoc

Source: ESMO 2026 2519O · Marina C. Garassino

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091 — adjuvant pembrolizumab in resected early NSCLC (final analysis)

2511O
● Medium priorityPhase 3Adjuvant

Indication: Resected stage IB(T≥4cm)–IIIA NSCLC

Key finding: 6-y OS 68.5% vs 66.4%; HR 0.98 (0.81–1.18); p=0.41826. DFS median 58.7 vs 43.3 mo; HR 0.85 (0.73–0.98). LCSS HR 0.81 (0.63–1.03). Grade ≥3 AEs 34.0% vs 25.6%.

Clinical relevance: DFS benefit sustained; OS not significant (not powered).

OS not significant

Source: ESMO 2026 2511O · Mary E. O'Brien

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

ABBV-706 — SEZ6 ADC monotherapy (R/R SCLC)

3837RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1SEZ6 ADCSCLC

Indication: 2L+ R/R SCLC

Key finding: At 1.8 mg/kg Q3W (n=41): ORR 56%; mOS 12.4 mo. In 2L subset (n=17): ORR 82%; mOS 14.3 mo. 100% ctDNA clearance at C3D1 associated with improved PFS/OS.

Clinical relevance: Promising ADC with novel SEZ6 target in R/R SCLC.

Source: ESMO 2026 3837RO · Anne C. Chiang

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

SKB500 — B7-H3 ADC in ES-SCLC phase I

3816RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1B7-H3 ADCSCLC

Indication: Heavily pretreated unresectable SCLC

Key finding: 12 mg/kg: ORR 70.0%; mDoR 5.8 mo; mPFS 7.2 mo. 16 mg/kg: ORR 61.9%; mPFS 5.6 mo. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 47.5% vs 61.9%.

Clinical relevance: 12 mg/kg selected for further development.

Source: ESMO 2026 3816RO · Haifeng Liu

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

MDT-BRIDGE — ctDNA clearance during neoadj durva + chemo (resectable NSCLC)

LBA62
● Medium priorityPhase 2ctDNAPerioperative

Indication: Resectable/borderline resectable stage IIB–IIIB NSCLC

Key finding: 99.1% ctDNA+ at BL; pre-Sx/CRT CL 36.7%; PPV at C2D1 for pCR 83.3% (43.6–99.1); pCR pre-Sx CL 76.0% vs 20.9% non-pCR; 12-mo EFS 88.9% in resected pts without CL.

Clinical relevance: Ultrasensitive ctDNA assay improves PPV for pCR, guiding neoadj decisions.

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA62 · Jonathan Spicer

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

CTONG 1804 Part 3 — induction chemo-IO in potentially resectable/UR stage III NSCLC

LBA65
● Medium priorityPhase 2Stage III

Indication: Treatment-naïve stage III NSCLC, EGFR/ALK WT

Key finding: R0 98.1% of surgical pts; ORR 82.9% in surgery arm; pCR 48.6%, MPR 64.8%; 12-mo EFS 84.6% surgery vs 66.7% CRT; overall 12-mo EFS 68.6%.

Clinical relevance: Supports surgical conversion strategy after induction chemo-IO.

Single-arm

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA65 · Yi Pan

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

LungMate-014 — neoadj toripalimab + chemo ± tifcemalimab (BTLA) in stage III NSCLC

2574RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2BTLANeoadjuvant

Indication: Potentially resectable stage III NSCLC

Key finding: pCR 32.2% vs 25.4% (TCT vs TC); R0 100% of operated pts; 24-mo EFS 71.1% vs 66.0%; 24-mo OS 83.0% vs 76.1%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 77.6% vs 75.4%.

Clinical relevance: Signal of added benefit of tifcemalimab in non-squamous/PD-L1 <1%.

Small single-center phase 2

Source: ESMO 2026 2574RO · Peng Zhang

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

THRIVE (KCSG LU23-09) — rivoceranib in pretreated metastatic thymic epithelial tumours

4155RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2Thymic

Indication: Pretreated metastatic thymoma/thymic carcinoma

Key finding: Confirmed ORR 35.0% (22.1–50.5); DCR 85.0%; mPFS 11.8 mo overall (NR thymoma; 10.0 mo carcinoma); OS NR. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 55.0%.

Clinical relevance: Durable antitumour activity supports rivoceranib as treatment option in TET.

Source: ESMO 2026 4155RO · Sehhoon Park

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

iTHYM — ivonescimab + chemo (1L recurrent/metastatic thymic carcinoma)

4156RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2ThymicPD-1/VEGF

Indication: 1L recurrent/metastatic thymic carcinoma

Key finding: ORR 83.3%; DCR 100%; PFS6m 100% (19/19); 4 progressions at 7.0–18.2 mo. mPFS and mOS not reached.

Clinical relevance: Met primary endpoint of PFS6m; promising 1L activity.

Single-arm; small n

Source: ESMO 2026 4156RO · Xue Hou

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

MTAP loss in mesothelioma — NETMESO MESOPATH/RENAPE 1433 cases

4158RO
● WatchTranslationalMesothelioma

Indication: Pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma

Key finding: MTAP loss in 48% PM, 16% PeM; 42% E-PM, 70% B-PM, 73% S-PM (p<0.0001); concordance with CDKN2A FISH 80%. Better OS in S-PM with MTAP loss (p=0.0001).

Clinical relevance: Supports MTAP IHC as reliable surrogate for CDKN2A/B HD.

Source: ESMO 2026 4158RO · Sylvie Lantuejoul

🫁 Thoracic / Lung Cancer

scRNA-seq of EGFRm lung adenocarcinoma — dynamic ecosystem subtypes during TKI

4243O
● WatchTranslationalscRNA-seq

Indication: EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma across TKI course

Key finding: Five ecosystem subtypes identified; metabolic-EMT resistant subtype linked to STAT3/EMT; targeted inhibition enhanced TKI efficacy in vitro and in vivo.

Clinical relevance: Identifies actionable vulnerability in TKI resistance.

Source: ESMO 2026 4243O · Shiyue Wan

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

7 studies

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

LEAP-012 — lenvatinib + pembro + TACE vs placebo + TACE (unresectable non-metastatic HCC) long-term OS

1678RO
● High priorityPhase 3HCC

Indication: Unresectable non-metastatic HCC

Key finding: mOS 40.4 vs 40.8 mo; HR 0.98 (0.76–1.26). mPFS 14.6 vs 10.2 mo; HR 0.70 (0.56–0.89). ORR RECIST 48.1% vs 33.7%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 72.2% vs 32.0%.

Clinical relevance: PFS benefit confirmed but no OS benefit at long follow-up.

OS primary endpoint not met

Source: ESMO 2026 1678RO · Josep M. Llovet

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

OPTIMUM — maintenance olaparib ± durvalumab in DDR-mutated aBTC

LBA22
● High priorityPhase 2BTCDDR

Indication: Advanced BTC with DDR mutations, post 1L platinum

Key finding: 6-mo PFS: Arm A 62.5%, Arm B 62.1%. Overall mPFS 8.2 mo; 2-y OS 40.1%. cHRD subgroup: mPFS 20.5 vs 7.4 mo (p=0.008); mOS NR vs 16.5 mo (p=0.007).

Clinical relevance: Supports PARP inhibitor maintenance in cHRD-defined DDR-mutated aBTC.

Non-comparative

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA22 · Changhoon Yoo

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

Envafolimab + GEMOX vs GEMOX (1L advanced BTC, China)

473RO
● High priorityPhase 3BTCSC anti-PD-L1

Indication: Treatment-naïve unresectable/metastatic BTC

Key finding: mOS 10.9 vs 8.6 mo; HR 0.723 (0.585–0.880); p=0.0016. 12/24/36-mo OS 44.2%/19.9%/12.5% vs 29.9%/10.8%/7.7%. ORR 27.6% vs 20.9%; mDoR 5.5 vs 4.2 mo.

Clinical relevance: SC envafolimab + GEMOX emerges as potential 1L SoC.

Source: ESMO 2026 473RO · Weijia Fang

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

HRS-4642 + GnP ± adebrelimab — KRAS G12D-mutant perioperative pancreatic cancer

LBA85
● High priorityPhase 2KRAS G12DPDAC

Indication: Treatment-naïve resectable/borderline KRAS G12D-mutant PDAC

Key finding: ORR 63% (Cohort 1) and 87% (Cohort 2). R0 100%; MPR 17% in both. 6-mo EFS 87% and 96%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 47%/53%.

Clinical relevance: Promising neoadjuvant activity; adebrelimab may enhance efficacy.

Small, no OS yet

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA85 · Chenlei Wen

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

INCB161734 + GnP or mFFX — KRAS G12D advanced PDAC

3137RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1KRAS G12D

Indication: KRAS G12D advanced/metastatic PDAC 1L/2L

Key finding: ORR GnP combo 62.5% (40.6–81.2); DCR 95.8%. mFFX combo ORR 75.0% (53.3–90.2); DCR 100%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 76% and 68%.

Clinical relevance: Supports phase 3 DAWN-303.

Source: ESMO 2026 3137RO · Antoine Hollebecque

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

C-CAR031 — GPC3 CAR-T in advanced HCC (phase I update)

1680RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1CAR-THCC

Indication: GPC3+ advanced HCC post ≥1 systemic therapy

Key finding: ORR 44% overall (16/36); DCR 92%; mPFS 4.2 mo; mDOR 4.4 mo; 12-mo OS 65.4%. Tumor shrinkage in 89%. 1 treatment-related death (TLS/renal).

Clinical relevance: Encouraging activity in heavily pretreated HCC.

Source: ESMO 2026 1680RO · Qi Zhang

⚕ Gastrointestinal Cancers

ASTRA — agentic AI for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resectability

172RO
● WatchAIpCCA

Indication: Preoperative resectability of pCCA

Key finding: Dev accuracy 0.907 (0.888–0.925); real-world ASTRA-assisted accuracy 0.897 vs 0.724; pre-MDT time halved (255 vs 518 s; p<0.001); surgeons adopted AI judgment in 89.7%.

Clinical relevance: Feasible accountable decision-support in oncology.

Source: ESMO 2026 172RO · Yanqi Huang

🔷 Genitourinary Cancers

4 studies

🔷 Genitourinary Cancers

S1823/GCC.1 — miR371 for GCT relapse detection on active surveillance

LBA58
● Medium priorityBiomarkerGCT

Indication: Newly diagnosed GCT on active surveillance

Key finding: 631 pts contributed; 104 relapses. miR371 specificity 0.90; sensitivity 0.20 BL, 0.54 at relapse. Positive BL miR371 doubled relapse risk (HR 2.04; p=0.02).

Clinical relevance: High accuracy supports integration into surveillance.

Low sensitivity at baseline

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA58 · Lucia Nappi

🔷 Genitourinary Cancers

AI-assisted preoperative communication in prostate cancer (RP)

173RO
● WatchAIProstate

Indication: Newly diagnosed PCa scheduled for radical prostatectomy

Key finding: Post-communication GAD-7 3.2 vs 5.7 (p=0.001); NASA-TLX 39.9 vs 56.8 (p<0.001); communication time 11.3 vs 19.9 min (p<0.001).

Clinical relevance: AI reduces anxiety and physician workload.

Source: ESMO 2026 173RO · Bo Dai

🔷 Genitourinary Cancers

RCC multi-omics — organotropism and 16-protein classifier

4241O
● WatchTranslationalRCC

Indication: RCC with/without metastasis

Key finding: 1,100 specimens from 563 pts; 12q gain and PUS1→PPARD axis accelerates metastasis; 16-protein classifier for prognosis/TKI response; NCKAP1L drives brain metastasis via mTOR/BBB disruption.

Clinical relevance: Framework for precision oncology in metastatic RCC.

Source: ESMO 2026 4241O · Yuanyuan Qu

🔷 Genitourinary Cancers

GPNMB+ macrophages and lymphatic metastasis in prostate cancer — CDX-011 ADC

386RO
● WatchTranslationalProstate

Indication: Lymphatic metastasis in prostate cancer

Key finding: GPNMB+ TAMs increased from 1.2% to 13.1% (p<0.001) in mHSPC; HR 2.45 (1.68–3.57) for MFS. CDX-011 achieved 85% macrophage depletion and 72% lymphatic metastasis reduction in vivo.

Clinical relevance: Highlights actionable macrophage–lymphatic axis.

Source: ESMO 2026 386RO · Xudong Ni

🌸 Gynaecological Cancers

2 studies

🌸 Gynaecological Cancers

TroFuse-005/ENGOT-en23/GOG-3095 — sacituzumab tirumotecan vs TPC (previously treated a/r endometrial)

LBA11
● High priorityPhase 3TROP2 ADC

Indication: Advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer post platinum + anti-PD-1/PD-L1

Key finding: mPFS 7.2 vs 3.9 mo; HR 0.59 (0.50–0.70); p<0.0001. mOS 19.0 vs 12.1 mo; HR 0.68 (0.55–0.84); p=0.0001. ORR 35.1% vs 17.3%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 54.4% vs 41.4%.

Clinical relevance: New treatment option for previously treated endometrial cancer.

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA11 · Domenica Lorusso

🌸 Gynaecological Cancers

KEYNOTE-C93/GOG-3064/ENGOT-en15 — 1L pembrolizumab vs CP (dMMR a/r EC)

LBA12
● High priorityPhase 3dMMRImmunotherapy

Indication: 1L dMMR advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma

Key finding: mPFS 38.2 vs 8.4 mo; HR 0.57 (0.42–0.79); P=0.0002. 36-mo OS 70.7% vs 62.0%; HR 0.77 (0.52–1.15). ORR 64.1% vs 62.1%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 18.1% vs 50.7%.

Clinical relevance: Chemo-free 1L option for dMMR EC with durable PFS benefit.

OS not statistically significant (secondary)

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA12 · Brian M. Slomovitz

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

10 studies

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

ARTEMIS-011 — risvutatug rezetecan vs gemcitabine+docetaxel (R/R osteosarcoma)

LBA9
● High priorityPhase 3B7-H3 ADCOsteosarcoma

Indication: Heavily pretreated R/R osteosarcoma

Key finding: BICR mPFS 5.5 vs 1.4 mo; HR 0.33; p<0.0001. INV mPFS 5.6 vs 1.0 mo. OS trend HR 0.51. Grade ≥3 TEAEs 92.5% vs 83.3%; 1 grade 2 ILD.

Clinical relevance: Potential new standard for R/R osteosarcoma.

OS immature

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA9 · Lu Xie

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

Peak crossover — bezuclastinib + sunitinib post-sunitinib (GIST)

3717RO
● Medium priorityPhase 3GIST

Indication: Advanced GIST post disease progression on sunitinib

Key finding: Crossover (n=128): mPFS 7.4 mo (5.6–11.0); ORR 29.7% (CR 1.6%, PR 28.1%). 33.3% of SUN non-responders responded to combination.

Clinical relevance: Supports broader mutational coverage with combination therapy.

Source: ESMO 2026 3717RO · Robin L. Jones

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

StrateGIST 1 — velzatinib molecular response (ctDNA) in GIST

3718RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1/1bctDNAGIST

Indication: Advanced GIST on velzatinib 300 mg/d

Key finding: KIT maxVAF clearance at wk 8 doubles mPFS (11 vs 5.5 mo; HR 0.51; p 0.01). >−99% clearance HR 0.44 (p 0.005).

Clinical relevance: MR in ctDNA as biomarker for durable benefit.

Source: ESMO 2026 3718RO · Sebastian Bauer

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

NB003 — selective KIT inhibitor in advanced GIST (final phase 1)

3719RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1GIST

Indication: KIT-mutant advanced GIST (2L to ≥4L)

Key finding: KIT-mutant GIST (n=158): ORR 29.1%; mDoR 10.8 mo; mPFS 7.5 mo; mOS 19.8 mo. 3L post imatinib+sunitinib (n=30): ORR 46.7%; mPFS 13.8 mo. 15 mg BID selected for phase 3.

Clinical relevance: Broad activity across KIT exon 9/11/13/14/17/18.

1 possibly treatment-related death

Source: ESMO 2026 3719RO · Ping Chi

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

Nab-paclitaxel + PLD in advanced malignant vascular tumours (phase II)

3720RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2Angiosarcoma

Indication: Advanced/unresectable malignant vascular tumours

Key finding: Confirmed ORR 50.0%; DCR 93.8%; mPFS 8.0 mo; mOS 28.4 mo. AS subgroup ORR 61.3%, mPFS 7.5, mOS 21.4 mo. EHE ORR 28.6%.

Clinical relevance: Promising activity especially in angiosarcoma.

Source: ESMO 2026 3720RO · Xing Zhang

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

TOMAS2 — PARP1 H-score and trabectedin + olaparib in advanced STS

3721RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2BiomarkerSTS

Indication: Advanced soft tissue sarcoma; uLMS subset

Key finding: H-score ≥70 (n=63): mPFS 4.30 vs 2.53 mo; HR 0.49 (0.29–0.83); p 0.008. uLMS H-score ≥70: mPFS 16.30 vs 1.35 mo; HR 0.15 (0.04–0.62); p 0.009.

Clinical relevance: PARP1 H-score may select pts for T+O, especially uLMS.

Exploratory

Source: ESMO 2026 3721RO · Lorenzo D'Ambrosio

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

T-DXd in desmoplastic small round cell tumours (French retrospective)

3722RO
● Medium priorityRetrospectiveDSRCT

Indication: DSRCT refractory to conventional therapy

Key finding: 11 pts; ORR 82% (9/11, 1 CR); 12-mo PFS 46%, 12-mo OS 67%; mPFS 6 mo; mOS NR. 1 treatment-related ILD death.

Clinical relevance: Highly effective in heavily pretreated DSRCT; prospective trial warranted.

Small retrospective series

Source: ESMO 2026 3722RO · Mehdi Brahmi

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

NETSARC+ registry — desmoid tumours in 3457 pts

3723RO
● Medium priorityRegistryDesmoid

Indication: Desmoid tumours 2010–2024

Key finding: Incidence 3.02/10^6/year; surgery rate decreased 47.2%→22.1%. mPFS 47.7 mo (39.7–55.8). Prognostic factors: tumour size, head/neck, limbs, trunk wall locations.

Clinical relevance: Supports treatment paradigm shift away from upfront surgery.

Source: ESMO 2026 3723RO · Armelle Dufresne

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

RINGSIDE Part B — varegacestat PROs in progressing desmoid tumours

3724RO
● Medium priorityPhase 2DesmoidPRO

Indication: Progressing desmoid tumours

Key finding: Sustained improvements through wk 48: DTSS Pain LS mean −2.48 vs 0.22; TSS-5 −1.50 vs 0.59; PROMIS PF 3.90 vs −3.04 favouring varegacestat.

Clinical relevance: Supports clinical benefit beyond efficacy endpoints.

Source: ESMO 2026 3724RO · Winette T. Van der Graaf

🧠 Sarcoma, CNS & Rare Tumours

Lifileucel TIL in UPS/DDLS (phase I feasibility)

3725RO
● Medium priorityPhase 1TILSarcoma

Indication: Refractory metastatic UPS/DDLS

Key finding: 8/10 infused; 3/8 (38%; 95% CI 8.5–75%) confirmed PRs ongoing; DCR 6/8 (75%); all pts grade 4 cytopenias.

Clinical relevance: Preliminary activity supports further evaluation in SARATOGA trial.

Small n; feasibility only

Source: ESMO 2026 3725RO · Lauren Banks

🦋 NETs & Endocrine Tumours

5 studies

🦋 NETs & Endocrine Tumours

LIBRETTO-531 — selpercatinib vs cabozantinib/vandetanib (1L RET-mutant MTC) updated

4208O
● High priorityPhase 3RETMTC

Indication: Advanced kinase inhibitor-naïve RET-mutant MTC

Key finding: 3-y PFS 75% vs 25%; HR 0.21 (0.14–0.30); p<0.0001. 3-y OS 92% vs 75%; HR 0.34 (0.19–0.59); p<0.0001. 3-y PFS2 91% vs 60%; HR 0.23 (0.13–0.40).

Clinical relevance: Confirms selpercatinib as 1L SoC in RET-mutant MTC.

Source: ESMO 2026 4208O · Jaume Capdevila

🦋 NETs & Endocrine Tumours

LBA57 — opamtistomig (PD-L1×4-1BB) monotherapy in pretreated EP-NEC

LBA57
● High priorityPhase 2bEP-NECBispecific

Indication: Advanced EP-NEC ≥2 prior lines

Key finding: ORR 26.0% by IRC; mDOR 9.2 mo; mOS 8.7 mo; mPFS 1.4 mo RECIST / 2.8 mo iRECIST. No liver metastasis subgroup: ORR 43.8%, mPFS 4.2 mo. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 28.1%.

Clinical relevance: Met primary endpoint; supports BLA.

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA57 · Ming Lu

🦋 NETs & Endocrine Tumours

Opamtistomig + EP/EC — 1L advanced EP-NEC (phase Ib/II)

2392O
● Medium priorityPhase 1b/2EP-NEC

Indication: Treatment-naïve advanced EP-NEC

Key finding: cORR 60.0% (3 CRs); mPFS 6.0 mo; mDoR 10.2 mo. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 79.7% (mainly chemo myelosuppression). No DLTs.

Clinical relevance: Encouraging 1L activity.

Source: ESMO 2026 2392O · Panpan Zhang

🦋 NETs & Endocrine Tumours

Pumitamig (PD-L1 × VEGF-A) + FOLFIRI — 2L unresectable NEN

2393O
● Medium priorityPhase 2NENBispecific

Indication: G3 NETs or NEC post 1L PT-based chemo

Key finding: cORR 40.0%; DCR 86.7%; mDOR 5.9 mo; mPFS 5.5 mo; 12-mo OS 59.8%. Grade ≥3 TRAEs 80.6%; 1 treatment-related death.

Clinical relevance: Supports further investigation of pumitamig + chemo in NEN.

Single-arm n=31

Source: ESMO 2026 2393O · Jianming Xu

🦋 NETs & Endocrine Tumours

SETHY — sacituzumab govitecan in advanced DTC and ATC

4209O
● Medium priorityPhase 2TROP2Thyroid

Indication: RAI-refractory DTC and ATC

Key finding: DTC: confirmed ORR 4.4% (0.1–21.1); mPFS 5.5 mo; 12-mo PFS 33.5%. ATC: ORR 16.7% (1.9–45.5); mPFS 2.9 mo.

Clinical relevance: Encouraging activity in ATC and selected DTC histologies.

Low ORR in DTC

Source: ESMO 2026 4209O · Alejandro Garcia-Alvarez

🧪 Developmental Therapeutics & Early Phase

2 studies

🧪 Developmental Therapeutics & Early Phase

MOIO — reduced-frequency ICI vs standard ICI in responding advanced/metastatic cancer

LBA10
● High priorityPhase 3ICI de-escalation

Indication: Partial/complete responders after 6 months of standard-dose IO

Key finding: mPFS 25.0 vs 21.9 mo; HR 1.35 (0.9–2.0); p=0.0635 (exceeded futility boundary). Higher risk of death with reduced IO (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1–3.9; p=0.0143).

Clinical relevance: Reduced IO dose intensity did not achieve PFS non-inferiority.

Signal of inferior survival with reduced IO

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA10 · Gwenaëlle Gravis

🧪 Developmental Therapeutics & Early Phase

CURESPONSE — EVOC-based functional precision oncology

LBA95
● Medium priorityFunctionalPrecision

Indication: Advanced/metastatic malignancies

Key finding: EVOC generation 90% under protocol; at 2 mo (n=34 paired): sensitivity 71%, specificity 82%, PPV 50%, NPV 91.7%.

Clinical relevance: Supports EVOC as complement to molecular approaches.

Small evaluable cohort

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA95 · Jonathan M. Krell

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

7 studies

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

FCCSS cohort — SPLC risk in childhood cancer survivors by MLD

1149RO
● Medium priorityCohortSPLC

Indication: 5-y childhood cancer survivors (n=7006)

Key finding: SIR 2.26 (1.65–3.01). MLD 5–10 Gy sHR 3.75 (1.44–9.78); CIF 6.50% at age 60 vs 1.79%. Smoking sHR 2.57 (1.40–4.71). 66.7% PAF in MLD >5 Gy.

Clinical relevance: Supports risk-adapted LDCT screening thresholds.

Source: ESMO 2026 1149RO · Pamela Abdayem

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

SUNRISE — adolescent cancer-related risk behaviours

3442RO
● Medium priorityCohort

Indication: European adolescents (n=1979)

Key finding: 69.3% ≥2 risk behaviours. Older age (β=0.41; p<0.001) and teacher support (β=−0.13; p=0.001) associated with risk. Model explained 32.2% variance.

Clinical relevance: School environment key for cancer prevention.

Source: ESMO 2026 3442RO · Eunate Arana-arri

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

INTERCEPTION-Lung — LC prevention in severe mental illness

3884RO
● Medium priorityCohortLC prevention

Indication: Patients with SMI vs without

Key finding: 25 WSMI; median pack-y 45 vs 35 (p<0.001); emphysema 94% vs 72% (p=0.049); 3 WSMI died (12%) vs 5 WOSMI (1%) (log-rank p=0.031).

Clinical relevance: One-Stop Shop model promising for SMI patients.

Small WSMI n

Source: ESMO 2026 3884RO · Pamela Abdayem

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

cfDNA fragmentomics (FirstLook Lung) in LDCT-decliners

1150RO
● Medium priorityReal-worldLC

Indication: LDCT-eligible patients who declined screening

Key finding: 251 completed; 39.8% elevated; 65 completed LDCT; 11 (16.9%) Lung-RADS ≥3; 5 early-stage lung cancers diagnosed.

Clinical relevance: Blood-based prescreening may re-engage decliners.

Source: ESMO 2026 1150RO · Jun Zhang

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

PATHFINDER 2 — CSO-guided workups after MCED testing

1151RO
● Medium priorityMCED

Indication: Participants with positive MCED result

Key finding: 290/305 (95.1%) underwent dx workup; 147/167 (88.0%) cancers via CSO-guided workups; CSO accurate in 139/147 (94.6%). Dx resolution: 60% within 60 d, 74% within 90 d.

Clinical relevance: CSO-guided workups efficient and safe post MCED.

Source: ESMO 2026 1151RO · Dax Kurbegov

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

Mailed reminder + pre-scheduled appointment for mammography (RCT)

1152RO
● Medium priorityRCTScreening

Indication: Never-screened women aged 50–69 in Singapore

Key finding: Arm 1 uptake 2.6%; Arm 4 (MR+PSA) 25.4% (RR 9.8; 5.9–16.3). Cost per additional mammogram USD $24.

Clinical relevance: Scalable strategy to engage never-screeners.

Source: ESMO 2026 1152RO · Sasidharan Swarnalatha S. Lucky

🔍 Prevention, Screening & Early Detection

IGNITE-TX — family-based cascade genetic testing pilot RCT

1153RO
● Medium priorityRCTCGT

Indication: Probands with HBOC/LS and at-risk relatives

Key finding: ARR GC/CGT uptake at 6 mo: Arm 1 3.4%, Arm 2 19.9%, Arm 3 61.9%, Arm 4 76.1%. Adjusted OR for IGNITE-TX 29.1 (5.7–148.8); p<0.001.

Clinical relevance: Supports larger trial.

Pilot

Source: ESMO 2026 1153RO · Maria Iniesta

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

7 studies

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

TMB ≥16 mut/Mb threshold for ICI efficacy — multi-cohort

4249RO
● Medium priorityPan-cancerTMB

Indication: 97,820 pts across 5 international cohorts

Key finding: TMB ≥16 associated with improved OS (p=0.015) and PFS (p=0.024); TMB ≥10 not significant (p=0.25, p=0.76). Interaction p=0.0497 confirmed ICI-specific effect.

Clinical relevance: Refines tissue-agnostic TMB threshold.

Source: ESMO 2026 4249RO · Yuji Uehara

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

FcγR3A F158V SNP and anti-PD1 outcomes in melanoma (NADINA)

4250RO
● Medium priorityPharmacogenomicsMelanoma

Indication: NADINA neoadjuvant and adjuvant arms

Key finding: Adj EFS: F/F 61%, F/V 48%, V/V 25% (p=0.042); DMFS 67%/60%/37% (p=0.012). Neo EFS: F/F 84%, F/V 62%, V/V 62% (p=0.042).

Clinical relevance: V-allele carriers may benefit from anti-PD-L1 over anti-PD-1.

Source: ESMO 2026 4250RO · Steven Wijnen

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

Humoral immunity against melanocytic differentiation antigens (gp100, TRP2)

4251RO
● Medium priorityMelanomaAntibodies

Indication: Neoadjuvant/metastatic melanoma on ICI

Key finding: Higher gp100/TRP2 IgG associated with pathological response and DMFS (HR 0.21 and 0.20). In metastatic cohort (n=141), higher IgG improved PFS/OS. Patient-derived mAbs: TRP2 ADCC; gp100 ADC-mediated cytotoxicity.

Clinical relevance: Humoral immunity translatable to antibody-based therapy.

Source: ESMO 2026 4251RO · Lukas Flatz

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

Mitochondrial haplogroups and ICB T-cell bioenergetics (multi-cancer)

385RO
● WatchTranslationalICB

Indication: 416 pts across 4 cancer types on ICB

Key finding: ICB increased OxPHOS/glycolysis and SRC in T cells; SRC upregulation showed haplogroup specificity linked to survival observations.

Clinical relevance: Metabolism-directed strategies for ICB.

Source: ESMO 2026 385RO · Chak Fu Chan

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

GDF-15 and adipose CD8+ T-cell exhaustion in gastric cancer PD-1+chemo

4252RO
● WatchTranslationalGastric

Indication: Advanced gastric cancer 1L CTx±ICI (n=125)

Key finding: Fat gainers in ICI+CTx: mPFS 14 vs 9 mo (p=0.047); mOS 21 vs 15 mo (p=0.005). Higher BL GDF-15 shorter OS (mOS 11.7 vs 4.8 mo; p=0.012).

Clinical relevance: GDF-15/adipose axis as cachexia-directed vulnerability.

Source: ESMO 2026 4252RO · Joo Sung G. Shim

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

Spatial proteomics of myeloid TME in eTNBC on neoadj chemo-IO (NeoTRIP)

4240O
● WatchTranslationalTNBC

Indication: NeoTRIP eTNBC paired samples (n=248)

Key finding: CD204+M2 TAMs predicted lower pCR under CT+ICB (OR 0.85; p=0.002; p-interaction <0.01). Carboplatin-laden TIM4+M2 TAM subset expanded on-treatment.

Clinical relevance: Candidate IHC-translatable biomarkers of ICB response.

Source: ESMO 2026 4240O · Matteo Maria Naldini

🧬 Translational Research & Biomarkers

Temporal scRNA/spatial transcriptomics in early breast cancer on neoadj therapy

4242O
● WatchTranslationalBC

Indication: Early breast cancer, 64 pts

Key finding: Baseline hypoxia/angiogenesis signatures differentiated responders; CAF subpopulations linked to resistance; quiescent capillary expansion in non-responders.

Clinical relevance: Potential biomarker-driven strategies.

Source: ESMO 2026 4242O · Jeremy Mo

🤝 Supportive, Palliative & Survivorship

5 studies

🤝 Supportive, Palliative & Survivorship

Sleepio After Cancer (SAC) — dCBT-I vs sleep hygiene in women with cancer

LBA91
● High priorityRCTInsomnia

Indication: Women with cancer and insomnia (SCI ≤16)

Key finding: SCI improved more with dCBT-I: mean difference 6.36 (95% CI 4.96–7.76; P<0.001; Cohen's d=0.99). Remission 27% vs 12% (ITT; NNT=7); 62% vs 19% completers (NNT=3).

Clinical relevance: Supports wider integration of digital CBT-I in survivorship care.

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA91 · Donal J. Brennan

🤝 Supportive, Palliative & Survivorship

HOPE — personalized digital supportive-care pathway for ET symptoms in early BC

LBA92
● Medium priorityPhase 3Digital

Indication: Stage I–III HR+ BC on ET with symptoms

Key finding: 180 pts randomized; 162 (90%) completed M3. Full outcomes/analyses to be presented; baseline characteristics balanced.

Clinical relevance: Potential to reduce ET symptom burden and improve self-management.

Abstract text truncated

Source: ESMO 2026 LBA92 · Maria Alice Franzoi

🤝 Supportive, Palliative & Survivorship

FURTHER — MR-HIFU ± EBRT vs EBRT for painful bone metastases

3084O
● Medium priorityRCTPalliative

Indication: Painful non-spinal bone metastases

Key finding: Underpowered (n=69). At 2 wk: pain response 50% (MR-HIFU ± EBRT) vs 38% (EBRT); p=0.41. Pain score drops: EBRT 2.3, combination 3.7, MR-HIFU 3.6.

Clinical relevance: MR-HIFU effective palliation; combination may enhance response.

Target not reached; underpowered

Source: ESMO 2026 3084O · Manon Braat

🤝 Supportive, Palliative & Survivorship

Mirtazapine vs olanzapine in CINV with triplet HEC prophylaxis

3893O
● Medium priorityRCTCINV

Indication: Chemo-naïve pts receiving HEC (n=120)

Key finding: Overall TC 46.2% vs 21.8% (P=0.005); delayed TC 52.3% vs 25.5% (P=0.003); overall AEs 70.8% vs 91.0% (P=0.006).

Clinical relevance: Mirtazapine superior for nausea control and QoL.

Source: ESMO 2026 3893O · Anusha Mruthyunjaya Swamy

🤝 Supportive, Palliative & Survivorship

CCORG-001 — rhTPO prevention for CTIT and cardiac injury (RCT)

3894O
● Medium priorityRCTCTIT

Indication: High-risk cancer pts (n=165)

Key finding: Platelet ≥75×10^9/L maintained: 62.5% vs 22.6% (diff 39.8%; p<0.001). Severe thrombocytopenia 25.0% vs 41.5% (p=0.032); rescue therapy 29.5% vs 77.4% (p<0.001); abnormal BNP/NT-proBNP 31.3% vs 49.1% (p=0.028).

Clinical relevance: Supports prophylactic rhTPO in dual-risk pts.

Source: ESMO 2026 3894O · Lili Tian

🌍 Public Policy, Access & Health Services

4 studies

🌍 Public Policy, Access & Health Services

Machine-learning multicancer risk from routine clinical data (PRE-Screen)

280RO
● Medium priorityAIRisk

Indication: 20 common cancers; UK Biobank n=502,309 + validation

Key finding: AUROCs >0.85 for lung, oesophageal, liver cancers; limited predictability for ovarian. LLM agents outperform zero-shot prediction.

Clinical relevance: Scalable multi-cancer pre-screening framework.

Source: ESMO 2026 280RO · Paul-Henry Koop

🌍 Public Policy, Access & Health Services

CHAIMELEON — in-silico clinical validation platform (5 cancers)

171RO
● WatchAI

Indication: Lung, breast, prostate, colon, rectal cancer validation

Key finding: AI assistance reduced evaluation time (p<0.001); accuracy 54%→58%; 55% clinicians improved, 28% worsened; 69% re-verified data on discordant predictions.

Clinical relevance: Platform for AI validation and human-centric evaluation.

Source: ESMO 2026 171RO · Gloria Ribas Despuig

🌍 Public Policy, Access & Health Services

OPTIMA — federated real-world evidence platform (OHDSI + NVFlare)

117RO
● WatchFederatedRWE

Indication: Oncology multimodal analytics across 6 European centres

Key finding: GDPR-compliant deployment; federated cohort characterisation and tissue classification completed; mean validation accuracy 87%.

Clinical relevance: Scalable cross-institutional RWE generation.

Source: ESMO 2026 117RO · Nils Christian

🌍 Public Policy, Access & Health Services

qXR AI chest radiograph analysis — early LC detection (Argentina)

282RO
● WatchAILC

Indication: Routine CXR at Hospital de Córdoba, Argentina

Key finding: 4,715 CXRs; 40 flagged high-risk; 65 completed LDCT; 4 primary LCs diagnosed (67% biopsy yield); 5 total early-stage LC (IA3–IB).

Clinical relevance: Supports AI utility in LMIC settings.

Source: ESMO 2026 282RO · Nestor O. Bustamante

📋 Program Sessions — Invited Talks

no abstracts

Official sessions built from invited talks / pro-con debates. No abstract text is published for these, so no results are reported here — only the programme (talk titles and speakers).
Proffered paper: Supportive and palliative care
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant LBA91 and LBA92 — Karin Jordan (Potsdam, Germany); 2) Q&A and discussion; 3) Invited Discussant 3084O, 3893O and 3894O — Florian Scotté (Villejuif, France); 4) Q&A and discussion
Proffered Paper session
Proffered paper 2: NSCLC, metastatic
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant LBA69, 2615O — Rebecca Heist (Boston, United States of America, MA); 2) Q&A and discussion; 3) Invited Discussant LBA71 and LBA72 — Simon Ekman (Solna, Sweden); 4) Q&A and discussion
Proffered Paper session
Proffered paper: NETs and endocrine tumours
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant LBA57, 2392O and 2393O — Jaydira Del Rivero (Bethesda, United States of America); 2) Q&A and discussion; 3) Invited Discussant 4208O and 42090 — Tiago Nunes (Lisboa, Portugal); 4) Q&A and discussion
Proffered Paper session
Proffered paper: Non-metastatic NSCLC and other thoracic malignancies
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 3808O and 3809O — Kersti Oselin (Tallinn, Estonia); 2) Q&A and discussion; 3) Invited Discussant LBA64, 2519O and 2511O — Jordi Remon Masip (Villejuif, France); 4) Q&A and discussion
Proffered Paper session
Proffered paper 2: Basic science and translation research
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 4241O and 4243O — James L. Reading (London, United Kingdom); 2) Q&A and discussion; 3) Invited Discussant 4240O and 4242O — Marleen Kok (Amsterdam, Netherlands); 4) Q&A and discussion
Proffered Paper session
Presidential Symposium III
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant LBA9 — Nathalie Gaspar (Villejuif, France); 2) Invited Discussant LBA10 — Jarushka Naidoo (Dublin, Ireland); 3) Invited Discussant LBA11 — Joyce F. Liu (Boston, United States of America); 4) Invited Discussant LBA12 — Christian Marth (Innsbruck, Austria); 5) Q&A and discussion
Proffered Paper session
Rapid oral: AI & digital health
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 280RO and 172RO — Marco Lorenzi (Paris, France); 2) Invited Discussant 171RO and 117RO — Daniel Truhn (Aachen, Germany); 3) Invited Discussant 173RO and 282RO — Caroline Chung (Houston, United States of America); 4) Q&A and discussion
Rapid Oral session
Rapid oral: Sarcoma
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 3717RO, 3718RO and 3719RO — Palma Dileo (Bologna, Italy); 2) Invited Discussant 3720RO, 3721RO and 3722RO — Cesar Serrano (Barcelona, Spain, Barcelona); 3) Invited Discussant 3723RO, 3724RO and 3725RO — Mark A. Dickson (New York, United States of America, NY); 4) Q&A and discussion
Rapid Oral session
Rapid oral: Non-metastatic NSCLC and other thoracic malignancies
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 3837RO and 3816RO — Joachim G. Aerts (Rotterdam, Netherlands); 2) Invited Discussant LBA62, LBA65 and 2574RO — Rafal Dziadziuszko (Gdansk, Poland); 3) Invited Discussant 4155RO, 4156RO and 4158RO — Marina C. Garassino (Chicago, United States of America); 4) Q&A and discussion
Rapid Oral session
Rapid oral 2: Basic science and translational research
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 4249RO, 4250RO and 4251RO — Ines E. Pires da Silva (Lisbon, Portugal); 2) Invited Discussant 385RO, 4252RO, 386RO — Shahneen K. Sandhu (Melbourne, Australia); 3) Invited Discussant LBA58 and LBA95 — Noelia Tarazona Llavero (Valencia, Spain); 4) Q&A and discussion
Rapid Oral session
Rapid oral 2: Breast cancer, advanced stage
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 4639RO, 4RO, 5RO and 4640RO — Sherene Loi (Melbourne, Australia); 2) Invited Discussant 1767RO, 1768RO and LBA49 — Antonio Llombart Cussac (Valencia, Spain); 3) Invited Discussant 1769RO, 1770RO and 4449RO — Pedram Razavi (New York, United States of America); 4) Q&A and discussion
Rapid Oral session
Rapid oral 2: Gastrointestinal tumour, upper digestive
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant LBA84, LBA85 and 3137RO — Monica Niger (Milan, Italy); 2) Invited Discussant 1678RO and 1680RO — Anna Saborowski (Hannover, Germany); 3) Invited Discussant LBA22 and 473RO — Chiara Braconi (Glasgow, United Kingdom); 4) Q&A and discussion
Rapid Oral session
Rapid oral: Prevention, early detection and intervention
Talks: 1) Invited Discussant 1149RO, 3442RO and 3883RO — Marjanka K. Schmidt (Amsterdam, Netherlands); 2) Invited Discussant 3884RO, 1150RO and 1151RO — Christian F. Singer (Vienna, Austria); 3) Invited Discussant 1152RO and 1153RO — Banu Arun (Houston, United States of America, TX); 4) Q&A and discussion
Rapid Oral session
Keynote lecture 4
Talks: 1) Nicholas McGranahan (London, United Kingdom) — Nicholas McGranahan (London, United Kingdom); 2) Ageing and cancer: An inevitable fate or a preventable consequence of inflammation? — Miriam Merad (New York, United States of America)
Keynote lecture
Advancing targeted and immunotherapeutic strategies in upper GI cancer
Talks: 1) Antibody Drug Conjugates — Jeeyun Lee (Seoul, Republic of Korea); 2) BITE and immune checkpoints — Lisa L. Liu Burström (Stockholm, Sweden); 3) Overview of RAS and other mutational targets — Jeroen Dekervel (Leuven, Belgium); 4) Personalised vaccines and cell therapies — Lin Shen (Beijing, China); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
Navigating the wave of new therapies in gynaecologic cancers
Talks: 1) New strategies for optimizing DNA damage repair inhibition in ovarian cancer — Charlie Gourley (Edinburgh, United Kingdom); 2) New immunotherapy treatments and combinations — Kathleen N. Moore (Omaha, United States of America); 3) Present and future of ADC in gynaecological cancers — Toon Van Gorp (Leuven, Belgium); 4) New technologies for monitoring tumour response and outcome — Pierre Laurent-Puig (Paris, France); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
New targets and strategies
Talks: 1) Extrachromosomal DNA and clinical implications — Chris Bailey (London, United Kingdom); 2) Updates on radioligands — Maria E. RodrÍguez-Ruiz (Pamplona, Spain); 3) Mechanism of action of bispecifics and beyond — Jessica C. Hassel (Heidelberg, Germany); 4) New small molecules — Timothy Anthony Yap (Houston, United States of America, Surrey); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
Pancreatic cancer: From biology to emerging therapies
Talks: 1) Deciphering pancreatic cancer: Tumor biology, metastasis, and molecular vulnerabilities — Vincenzo Corbo (Verona, Italy); 2) Early-onset pancreatic cancer: The role of the host — Irit Ben-Aharon (Haifa, Israel); 3) Next-generation therapies: ADCs, small molecules, and rational combinations — Teresa Macarulla Mercade (Barcelona, Spain); 4) Immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer: Overcoming barriers to Success — Vinod Balachandran (New York, United States of America); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
Addressing the risk of second primary cancers
Talks: 1) Assessing the risk of second malignancies after a primary cancer — Trille Kristina Kjaer (Copenhagen, Denmark); 2) Can behavioural interventions manage both general survivorship aspects and the risk of secondary malignancies? — James C. Chow (Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China); 3) Drug interventions to reduce the risk of second primaries: Where do we stand? — Pierre-Etienne Heudel (Lyon, France, CEDEX); 4) Addressing secondary cancer risk in paediatric survivors — Matthew Ehrhardt (Memphis, United States of America); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
Incorporation of biomarkers for early breast cancer
Talks: 1) Dynamic tissue-based biomarkers to guide treatment — Carsten Denkert (Marburg, Germany); 2) Current use of genomic assays — Kevin Kalinsky (Atlanta, United States of America); 3) How to integrate new imaging techniques in the clinic — Ritse Mann (Amsterdam, Netherlands); 4) MRD to inform treatment decision — Nicholas Turner (London, United Kingdom); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
Balancing weight issues in cancer patients: Not too much and not too little
Talks: 1) Management of obesity in cancer patients — Signe Borgquist (Aarhus, Denmark); 2) Multimodal interventions for anorexia and cachexia — Matthew Maddocks (London, United Kingdom); 3) Novel therapeutics in cancer anorexia-cachexia — Richard Dunne (Rochester, United States of America); 4) Nutritional recommendations in cancer survivorship — Alessandro Laviano (Rome, Italy); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
Emerging biological agents and their role in innate immunity modulation
Talks: 1) Bispecific antibodies — Stephane Champiat (Houston, United States of America, CEDEX); 2) Antibody drug conjugates — Lukas Jeker (Basel, Switzerland); 3) Anusha Kalbasi (Palo Alto, United States of America) — Anusha Kalbasi (Palo Alto, United States of America); 4) Cell therapy beyond T-cells: What's new? — Gill Saar (Philadelphia, United States of America); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
IO-based systemic therapy in head and neck cancers
Talks: 1) IO-based systemic therapy (incl pt selection) — Renata Ferrarotto (Houston, United States of America); 2) Evolving surgical strategies after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: What should change? — Ravi Uppaluri (Boston, United States of America); 3) Pathological response assessment and biological correlates — Periklis G. Foukas (Haidari, Greece); 4) Evolving roles of radiotherapy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: Less, more, or different? — Ester Orlandi (Pavia, Italy); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special symposium
Early detection and prevention of cancer
Talks: 1) ESMO’s Framework for the evaluation of cancer early detection biomarkers in bodily fluids — Bruno Duso (Villejuif, France); 2) Mitigating obesity and metabolism-related cancer risk: Recommendations from the ESMO Early Detection and Prevention of Cancer Task Force — Neil M. Iyengar (Atlanta, United States of America); 3) ESMO guidance on endpoints, study designs, and expected magnitude of clinical benefit for the pharmacological prevention of cancer — Alexandre Xu-Vuillard (Villejuif, France); 4) Q&A and discussion
Special session
ESMO-ESC: Joining forces - Shared mechanisms and opportunities for cardiovascular and cancer prevention
Talks: 1) Clonal haematopoiesis and cancer risk: Precursor, biomarker, or prevention target? — Kirsten Groenbaek (Copenhagen, Denmark); 2) Cardiovascular risk stratification in cancer: From LVEF to CHIP — Teresa Lopez Fernandez (Madrid, Spain); 3) Targeting IL-1β: From cardiovascular prevention to cancer prevention? — Tej Pandya (London, United Kingdom); 4) Drivers of cardiovascular disease after cancer therapy — Pietro Ameri (Genova, Italy); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special session
When standards are unsustainable: Redefining cancer treatment under resource pressure
Talks: 1) If the standard of care cannot be delivered, is it still a standard, or a hypothesis? — Sjoukje F. Oosting (Groningen, Netherlands); 2) NSCLC: Dose flexibility and exposure-response plateau in immunotherapy — Felipe Roitberg (Brasilia, Brazil); 3) Breast cancer: Beyond maximalism in HER2-positive breast cancer — Sitna N. Mwanzi (Nairobi, Kenya); 4) From evidence to access: Operationalising adaptation at scale — Manju Sengar (Mumbai, India); 5) From registration trials to adaptation: The ESMO proposed work agenda / frameworks — Dirk Arnold (Hamburg, Germany); 6) Should adaptation be legitimised? — Dario Trapani (Milan, Italy); 7) Q&A and discussion
Special session
What oncologists should know about generative AI to support their clinical practice
Talks: 1) What are the solutions to assist oncologists during their clinics? — Ciro Celsa (Palermo, Italy); 2) How should oncologists prompt generative AI? — Federica Corso (Milan, Italy); 3) What is the regulatory and ethical frame? — Stephen Gilbert (Dresden, Germany); 4) Q&A and discussion
Special session
What oncologists should know about interpreting tumour sequencing
Talks: 1) Somatic vs germline: Avoiding the most common mistakes — Michael Bonner Foote (New York, United States of America); 2) Liquid biopsy and CHIP: What clinicians need to know — Terri P. McVeigh (Sutton, United Kingdom); 3) Interpreting low-risk germline variants — Christoph Benedikt Westphalen (Munich, Germany); 4) Q&A and discussion
Special session
ESMO Fellowship Programme: Educational opportunities for young oncologists
Talks: 1) Teresa M. Amaral (Strasbourg, France, PT) — Teresa M. Amaral (Strasbourg, France, PT); 2) From fellow to leader: Reflections on the long-term impact of an ESMO Fellowship — Sherene Loi (Melbourne, Australia); 3) What a young oncologist can expect from a mentor and how to make the most of the relationship — Andres Cervantes (Valencia, Spain); 4) From emerging oncologist to independent investigator: A personal journey — Maria Fernanda Mosele (Villejuif, France); 5) The value of ESMO Fellowships: Reflections from the President — Fabrice André (Villejuif, France); 6) Teresa M. Amaral (Strasbourg, France, PT) — Teresa M. Amaral (Strasbourg, France, PT); 7) Awards: Presentation of the 2026 Fellows and Merit Awardees, and 2025 Best Exam
Special session
How can the use of ESMO's Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) help drive standards of care?
Talks: 1) Introduction to the development of ESMO's CPG — Sanjay Popat (London, United Kingdom); 2) The effectiveness of CPG in improving survival and quality of life — Carsten Bokemeyer (Hamburg, Germany); 3) The patient perspective on the use of CPG in the cancer continuum — Zorana Maravic (Brussels, Belgium); 4) EUnetCCC's role in delivering equitable access to state-of-the-art cancer care — Claudia María Valverde Morales (Barcelona, Spain); 5) Q&A and discussion
Special session
ESMO-CSCO: Navigating the development pathways of cancer therapeutics -From China to the world
Talks: 1) Highlights of evidence generated in China-only trials during ESMO 2025 and 2026: Take home lessons for the future — Lu Si (Beijing, China); 2) Innovations in breast cancer in China: Novel agents and emerging approaches — Shusen Wang (Guangzhou, China); 3) How can we extrapolate data from phase III done exclusively in China? Strategies for global access — Elena Garralda (Barcelona, Spain); 4) Q&A and discussion
Special session
Optimal management of high-grade serous ovarian cancer with BRCA mutation
Talks: 1) Presentation of case/condition — Esteban A. Ciliberti (Bellinzona, Switzerland); 2) Surgery and first-line systemic therapy: How to choose among the different options? — Sven Mahner (Munich, Germany); 3) Dealing with oligoprogression — Remi Nout (Rotterdam, Netherlands); 4) Systemic therapy for recurrent BRCAmut HGSOC during PARPi — Ilaria Colombo (Bellinzona, Switzerland); 5) Q&A and discussion
Multidisciplinary session
Response-based adaptive strategies in primary metastatic kidney cancer
Talks: 1) Presentation of case/condition — Geraldine Pignot (Marseille, France); 2) Image-guided strategy — Viktor Grünwald (Essen, Germany); 3) What to do with the primary in extreme responders — Geraldine Pignot (Marseille, France); 4) Timing and optimal local treatment for metastatic disease — Shankar Siva (Melbourne, Australia); 5) Q&A and discussion
Multidisciplinary session
Modern management of leptomeningeal metastases
Talks: 1) Presentation of case/condition — Lizza Hendriks (Maastricht, Netherlands); 2) Diagnostic and prognostic assessment — Adrienne Boire (New York, United States of America); 3) Systemic therapies for leptomenigeal disease — Matthias Preusser (Vienna, Austria); 4) Radiotherapy: When and when not? — Rakesh Jalali (Chennai, India); 5) Q&A and discussion
Multidisciplinary session
Optimal multidisciplinary management of penile cancer
Talks: 1) Presentation of case/condition — Maarten Albersen (Leuven, Belgium); 2) The surgical oncology point of view: Role of surgery of primary and LN — Maarten Albersen (Leuven, Belgium); 3) The medical oncology point of view: Role of adjuvant chemotherapy — Fernando C. Maluf (Sao Paulo, Brazil); 4) The radiation oncology point of view: Role of radiation therapy as definitive therapy or as adjuvant — Angela U. Pathmanathan (London, United Kingdom); 5) The medical oncology point of view: Distant metastatic recurrence post adjuvant therapy — Fernando C. Maluf (Sao Paulo, Brazil); 6) Q&A and discussion
Multidisciplinary session
Alleviating total suffering in patients with advanced cancer: It’s time for interdisciplinary interventions
Talks: 1) Presentation of case/condition — Caroline Poisson (Villejuif, France); 2) Management of total pain — Sebastiano Mercadante (Palermo, Italy); 3) Management of total dyspnea — Alex Molassiotis (Birmingham, United Kingdom, Pokfulam); 4) Anxiety and death anxiety — Gary M. Rodin (Toronto, Canada); 5) Q&A and discussion
Multidisciplinary session
How to optimise care for patients receiving prostate cancer systemic therapy
Talks: 1) Optimising therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer — Barbara Jereczek-Fossa (Milan, Italy); 2) Personalised systemic therapy for mHSPC — Aurelius G. Omlin (Zurich, Switzerland); 3) Management of mCRPC: Personalised treatment selection and sequencing — Deborah Mukherji (Dubai, United Arab Emirates); 4) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Navigating cellular aging: Optimising cancer therapy in the aging population
Talks: 1) Mapping aging tissues: Uncovering cancer-like molecular signatures — Milos Spasic (Boston, United States of America); 2) Placental-like reprogramming in early and late onset colorectal cancers — Alberto Bardelli (Torino, Italy, (TO)); 3) Identifying driver genes and mutations in cancer and in healthy aging tissues — Santiago Demajo Meseguer (Barcelona, Spain); 4) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Role and timing of targeted therapies in brain tumors
Talks: 1) Molecular diagnosis for targeted therapies in neuro-oncology — Adelheid Woehrer (Innsbruck, Austria); 2) Targeted therapy options in glioma — Louisa Von Baumgarten (Munich, Germany); 3) Targeted therapies in rare CNS malignancies: A success story — Evangelia Razis (Marousi, Greece); 4) Radiotherapy and targeted therapies: Combination and sequencing — Giuseppe Minniti (Rome, Italy); 5) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
From science to clinical use: Emerging systemic therapies for lung cancer
Talks: 1) Latest advances in targeted therapy for oncogene driven advanced NSCLC — Ross A. Soo (Singapore, Singapore); 2) Biology and mechanisms of action of novel immunotherapies — Tina Cascone (Houston, United States of America, MO); 3) Bispecifics, Trispecifics, T-cell engagers — Thomas Newsom-Davis (London, United Kingdom); 4) Management of toxicities from next generation immunotherapies — Roberto Ferrara (Milan, Italy); 5) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Digital health and AI in oncology: Transforming patient monitoring and care
Talks: 1) AI-driven remote patient monitoring: Enhancing home-based care — Nisarg Patel (San Francisco, United States of America); 2) Integrating patient-reported outcomes in digital health platform — Ines Vaz-Luis (Villejuif, France); 3) Digital biology twins and predictive oncology in drug discovery and development — Tony Ng (Greenford, United Kingdom); 4) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Tumour-agnostic oncology: From concept to clinical practice
Talks: 1) Tumour-agnostic biomarkers: Today and tomorrow — Caterina Marchiò (Candiolo, Italy); 2) Clinical trials and regulatory landscape in tumour-agnostic oncology — Alexander Drilon (New York, United States of America, NY); 3) Implementing tumour-agnostic therapies in clinical practice — Aya El-Helali (Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China); 4) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Optimising GIST management: From prognostic insights to new therapeutic strategies
Talks: 1) (Re)Defining the prognosis of GIST: Digital pathology, molecular risk scoring and clinical implications — Eva Wardelmann (Muenster, Germany); 2) The evolution trajectory of KIT mutations: How should we select the treatment for GIST patients? — Tom Wei-Wu Chen (Taipei City, Taiwan); 3) The impact of new second lines: Leaving the comfort zone of fixed sequences — Sebastian Bauer (Essen, Germany); 4) Local treatments for imatinib-resistant GIST: Implications of broad KIT inhibition — Aisha Miah (London, United Kingdom); 5) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Endocrine tumours at a glance
Talks: 1) Key aspects in the systemic management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms — Marianne E. Pavel (Erlangen, Germany); 2) How to simplify the algorithm of treatment of rare endocrine tumors — Julien Hadoux (Villejuif, France); 3) What should I pay attention to in the management of adrenal tumors? — Cristina L. Ronchi (Birmingham, United Kingdom); 4) Breaking barriers: Modern systemic treatments for thyroid cancers — Cosimo Durante (Rome, Italy); 5) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Optimising outcomes in oligometastatic colorectal cancer: Redefining treatment strategies and future directions
Talks: 1) Clinical and biological definitions of oligometastatic disease — Julien Taieb (Paris, France); 2) Pushing boundaries with local therapies: Maximizing patient outcomes and recognizing limitations — Martijn Meijerink (Amsterdam, Netherlands); 3) Advancing systemic therapy: Tailored approaches for oligometastatic colorectal cancer — Pia J. Osterlund (Tampere, Finland); 4) Q&A and discussion
Educational session
Resectable early stage NSCLC
Talks: 1) The pathologist guidance in clinical decision-making in early stage NSCLC — Jan Von der Thüsen (Rotterdam, Netherlands); 2) Shall we give adjuvant immunotherapy to all patients regardless of the pathological complete response status? — Mariana Brandão (Anderlecht, Belgium); 3) Peri-operative strategies in oncogene driven resectable early stage NSCLC — Pei Li Stephanie Saw (Singapore, Singapore); 4) Multistation N2 (N2b), T4 lesions, and pneumonectomy: Time to reconsider induction chemo-immunotherapy? — Isabelle Opitz (Zurich, Switzerland); 5) Q&A and discussion
Educational session

This report was generated automatically and is not medical advice. Clinical decisions must be verified against official abstract/presentation full texts and current guidelines.